15 research outputs found

    Structural framework conditions and individual motivations for youth-mobility: A macro-micro level approach for different European country-types

    Get PDF
    European youth mobility seems to be fostering Europe's unequal pace of integration, which sees certain countries benefit at the expense of others (Ohmacht et al., 2009; van Mol & Timmerman, 2014). Using a comparative approach, the paper aims to relate a macro-level country-typology focussing on human capital with individual mobility-motivations on the micro-level. Our methodological approach is based on a secondary macro-data analysis and analyses of mobility-motivations of young people (micro-data) deriving from qualitative (N=152) and quantitative data (N=5,499) collected in six European countries. In order to examine correspondence between macro-conditions and micro-aspects, we relate information on mobility-motivations to the country-typology by allocating mobile youth to the respective types of their home country. The results show that the country-types compose different opportunity structures, which are reflected in individual motivations. Accordingly, different country-types can be seen as an example of the heterogeneity and inequality of European social and territorial mobility frames

    Wie? Warum? Oder warum nicht? MobilitĂ€tsfelder sowie Motivationen und Barrieren für JugendmobilitĂ€t in Europa

    Get PDF
    Auslandserfahrungen sind nicht nur eine Möglichkeit, auf kulturelle Entdeckungsreise zu gehen. Sie gelten auch als Chance fĂŒr junge Menschen, zu lernen und sich persönlich und beruflich weiterzuentwickeln. Entsprechend wird JugendmobilitĂ€t in der Jugendarbeit große Aufmerksamkeit geschenkt. Auch die LĂ€nder, die die Jugendlichen entsenden oder aufnehmen, können dabei profitieren – aber auf unterschiedliche Weise. Zu welchem Zweck gehen junge Menschen ins Ausland? Was motiviert sie dabei? Welche Barrieren mĂŒssen sie dafĂŒr ĂŒberwinden? Welche Rolle spielt der familiĂ€re Bildungshintergrund der Jugendlichen? Diese Fragen werden mit Fokus auf lĂ€nderspezifische Unterschiede auf der Datenbasis des europĂ€ischen Forschungsprojekts MOVE untersucht, in das Wissenschaftler(innen) aus sechs europĂ€ischen LĂ€ndern involviert waren. Die Grundlage bildet zunĂ€chst eine LĂ€ndertypologie, die Humankapitalbewegungen durch Auslandsaufenthalte abbildet, welche je nach MobilitĂ€tsfeld eher dem Sende- oder EmpfĂ€ngerland zugutekommen. Sie weist europĂ€ische LĂ€nder vier Typen zu: MobilitĂ€tsförderern, MobilitĂ€tsverlierern, MobilitĂ€tsgewinnern und MobilitĂ€tsverwertern. Besonders erstere und letztere sind gut fĂŒr eine kontrastierende, lĂ€ndervergleichende Betrachtung geeignet. MobilitĂ€tsförderer sind LĂ€nder, deren junge Menschen im europĂ€ischen Ausland arbeiten, die aber selbst kein wichtiges Zielland fĂŒr europĂ€ische Jugendliche sind (z.B. Ungarn und RumĂ€nien). MobilitĂ€tsverwerter sind attraktive ZiellĂ€nder sowohl fĂŒr kurz- als auch langfristige MobilitĂ€ten und weisen damit bezĂŒglich der Generierung und Verwertung von Humankapital ein ausgeglichenes Konto auf (z.B. Norwegen, Luxemburg und Deutschland). In einem kontrastierenden Vergleich werden Motivationen und Barrieren fĂŒr Auslandsaufenthalte im Zusammenhang mit dem Bildungshintergrund junger Menschen aus MobilitĂ€tsförder- und MobilitĂ€tsverwerterlĂ€ndern analysiert. HierfĂŒr werden die Individualdaten eines Onlinesurveys mit 18-29-JĂ€hrigen (N=4.719) aus Deutschland, Luxemburg, Norwegen, Ungarn und RumĂ€nien den beiden LĂ€ndertypen zugeordnet und verglichen

    Aspect ratio for mesh partitioning

    No full text
    This paper deals with the measure of Aspect Ratio for mesh partitioning and gives hints why, for certain solvers, the Aspect Ratio of partitions plays an important role. We define and rate different kinds of Aspect Ratio, present a new center-based partitioning method which optimizes this measure implicitly and rate several existing partitioning methods and tools under the criterion of Aspect Ratio

    Capturing and Composing Parallel Patterns with Intel CnC

    No full text
    The most accessible and successful parallel tools today are those that ask programmers to write only isolated serial kernels, hiding parallelism behind a library interface. Examples include Google’s Map-Reduce [5], CUDA [13], and STAPL [12]. This encapsulation approach applies to a wide range of structured, well-understood algorithms, which we call parallel patterns. Today’s highlevel systems tend to encapsulate only a single pattern. Thus we explore the use of Intel CnC as a single framework for capturing and composing multiple patterns.

    A Performance Monitoring Interface for OpenMP

    No full text
    Abstract. This paper reports on efforts to define a performance monitoring interface for OpenMP that merges the OMPI and POMP prototype interfaces developed in the past year. The primary goal is to define a clear and portable API for OpenMP that makes execution events visible to runtime monitoring tools, primarily tools for performance measurement. The proposed specification is presented, covering many relevant design issues and the result of discussions among the involved groups. Both successful convergence of ideas, leading to agreement on proposed specifications, as well as differences in opinion and remaining open issues are documented from our many discussions. The paper is intended to serve as a preliminary proposal for consideration by the OpenMP Architecture Review Board and recently formed Tools sub-committee.

    The Concurrent Collections Programming Model

    No full text
    We introduce the Concurrent Collections (CnC) programming model. In this model, programs are written in terms of high-level operations. These operations are partially ordered according to only their semantic constraints. These partial orderings correspond to data dependences and control dependences. The role of the domain expert, whose interest and expertise is in the application domain, and the role of the tuning expert, whose interest and expertise is in performance on a specific architecture, can be viewed as separate concerns. The CnC programming model pro vides a high-level specification that can be used as a common language between the two experts, raising the level of their discourse. The model facilitates a significant degree of separation, which simplifies the task of the domain expert, who can focus on the application rather than scheduling concerns and mapping to the target architecture. This separation also simplifies the work of the tuning expert, who is given the maximum possible freedom to map the computation onto the target architecture and is not required to understand the details of the domain. However, the domain and tuning expert may still be the same person. We formally describe the execution semantics of CnC and prove that this model guarantees deterministic computation. We evaluate the performance of CnC implementations on several applications and show that CnC can effectively exploit several different kinds of parallelism and offer performance and scalability that is equivalent to or better than that offered by the current low-level parallel programming models. Further, with respect to ease of programming, we discuss the tradeoffs between CnC and other parallel program ming models on these applications
    corecore